Rethinking Who Fits the Mould
in Entrepreneurship Education

”Gendered assumptions are no longer going unchallenged — they’re being noticed, talked about, and sometimes quietly rewritten.”

In a nutshell

Entrepreneurship education may still lean on masculine ideals, but educators and students are increasingly aware of this — and some are finding ways to broaden the narrative.

In a Bigger Nutshell

For years, studies have shown that people often picture entrepreneurs as male. It’s a subtle association, but one that can have real consequences for who feels like they belong in entrepreneurial spaces and who doesn’t. This paper adds to that conversation by looking closely at how these assumptions show up and are sometimes challenged in the context of entrepreneurship education.

Drawing on interviews and classroom observations at a Dutch university, the study looks at how students and educators engage with the idea that entrepreneurship is often seen as “something men do.” Rather than treating this as an unchangeable fact, many participants recognised the gendered nature of the field, and some were actively working to broaden the picture.

Educators talked about how certain traits — like assertiveness, competitiveness, or being goal-driven — still dominate the way entrepreneurship is framed. But they also described how they try to open things up, for instance by inviting more diverse guest speakers, choosing case studies outside tech or finance, or discussing motivations beyond profit. These small choices in teaching were seen as ways to make more students feel like they could see themselves in entrepreneurial roles.

Students, too, were aware of the stereotypes. Some still associated entrepreneurship with a particular type of person, usually male, confident, independent, but others pointed to moments when that image shifted, often through seeing different kinds of role models or being encouraged to value things like collaboration or social impact.

Publication Date: December 2024

Authors: Sanne Stoker, Ingrid Wakkee, Svetlana Khapova

Institutions: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Study Type: Qualitative single-case study

Sample Size: 32 participants (18 students, 14 educators) + classroom observations

Research Focus: Gendered perceptions of entrepreneurship in higher education

Research Methodology: Semi-structured interviews and classroom observation

Main Findings: Gendered assumptions about entrepreneurs are still common in EE settings, but both educators and students are engaging with and sometimes challenging these ideas through teaching approaches, examples, and discussions.

Citation: Stoker, S., Wakkee, I., & Khapova, S. (2024). Educators and students in entrepreneurship education are challenging the “think entrepreneur–think male” paradigm. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & ResearchLink

The classroom setting played a big part. In some observed sessions, educators nudged students to reflect on what counts as “entrepreneurial” and why. Those discussions didn’t erase the dominant narrative, but they created space for alternatives.

That said, change wasn’t straightforward. Some educators weren’t sure how much to push back against the norm. Others worried that highlighting inclusion might be seen as softening the subject. Not every student welcomed a broader definition either, but overall, the study suggests that gendered assumptions are no longer going unchallenged — they’re being noticed, talked about, and sometimes quietly rewritten.

The research doesn’t claim that the problem is solved, though. In fact, many participants expressed uncertainty or mixed feelings, with some experiencing that the masculine image of the entrepreneur is still dominant and influential. Others were optimistic that more inclusive teaching practices and examples could gradually shift perceptions, even if change is slow.

What makes this study stand out is not just its focus on stereotypes, but its attention to how entrepreneurship is actively shaped in the classroom. Rather than framing gender bias as something that only exists “out there,” it shows how educational settings contribute to reinforcing or disrupting these assumptions.

Of course, the findings come from a single university and a relatively small group of people — only 18 students and 14 educators — so we shouldn’t overstate the reach of the results, but the insights are thoughtful and clearly grounded in what participants actually said and did. The paper doesn’t offer a blueprint for fixing gender bias in entrepreneurship education, but it does highlight the everyday decisions about examples, values, and language that help make entrepreneurship education more inclusive.

For educators and programme designers, there is a clear takeaway: it matters who we present as entrepreneurs, what stories we tell, and how we talk about success. These choices can either reinforce old patterns, or help open the door to more people seeing entrepreneurship as a path for them.

This connects to ideas explored in Teaching the Future Before It Arrives and Entrepreneurial Mindset and Education.

More Research Recaps:

Conceptual illustration of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and overconfidence among entrepreneurship students — SSES Research Recap.

Overconfidence in Entrepreneurship Students

Introductory entrepreneurship courses can unintentionally increase overconfidence, particularly in male students, while female students tend to show more realistic self-assessments. This gap suggests a need ...
It’s not risky if you know what you’re doing — digital financial literacy and entrepreneurial risk

It’s not risky if you know what you’re doing

Students who feel more financially capable also feel more entrepreneurial, suggesting that the issue may not be a lack of willingness to take risks, but ...
Entrepreneurship education research review illustration

Untangling the Threads of Entrepreneurship Education Research

By reviewing over 150 studies, this influential paper brought clarity to the messy world of entrepreneurship education research — showing that how we teach matters ...
Entrepreneurial ecosystems and motivation – research illustration

Why Ecosystems Aren’t Enough

In one of entrepreneurship education’s most influential studies, Liñán, Urbano, and Guerrero showed that it’s not flashy start-up hubs or government policies that drive entrepreneurial ...
Illustration symbolizing belief and self-efficacy in entrepreneurship education — Research Recap SSES.

Making Entrepreneurship Feel Doable

This seminal study helped move entrepreneurship education from assumption to evidence, showing that well-designed enterprise programmes can shift how high school students perceive the feasibility ...
Research Recap – entrepreneurial opportunity identification (illustration)

The Skill of Seeing What Others Miss

Being able to spot entrepreneurial opportunities isn’t just luck or instinct — it’s a skill that can (and should) be taught, with the right mix ...
Abstract illustration symbolizing balance and confidence in entrepreneurship training — Research Recap SSES

Maintaining Confidence in the Face of Realistic Challenges

Entrepreneurship training has its ups and downs, and maintaining students’ self-belief is key.

The Actual Skills You Need for Sustainable Entrepreneurship

Introductory entrepreneurship courses can unintentionally increase overconfidence, particularly in male students, while female students tend to show more realistic self-assessments. This gap suggests a need ...
Educators applying design thinking in entrepreneurship education

How Educators Apply Design Thinking to Entrepreneurship Education

Design thinking may be everywhere in entrepreneurship education, but it’s not always used the same way. This study explores how educators across Europe are interpreting ...
Illustration symbolising the activist turn in entrepreneurship education, where students learn to transform systems for sustainability and justice.

An Activist Turn in Entrepreneurship Education

Entrepreneurship education must stop treating sustainability and justice as electives. This paper argues for activist pedagogies that bake in purpose at the core, equipping students ...